I had to laugh tonight while looking for more information about this rather odd wildflower (or herb as some sources call it). The 8th source that showed up in a Google search was this site which was my own blog post from about this same time last year.
Haha, that means you’re now an accepted authority on Saxifrages! The world bows to your Saxifrage knowledge! 🙂 Gorgeous photos, especially the first one.
It doesn’t get much attention, probably because most overlook it . It really takes a close look to see all of its features and doesn’t have large showy petals like other flowers.
It’s a great photo anyway. Remarkable detail and focus on that first shot. It such an attractive little flower and most unusual in shape.
(would you believe that’s the way I found many names to put to my flower archives – from turning up an image on my own blog from 3 years ago). I’ve still got about 20 flower images to identify yet.
I’m glad I’m not the only one! I’ve found over 200 different species of wildflowers in the approximately 1500 square miles through which I wander, and from year to year I can’t remember all of them. I did compile a file of over 800 photos for a wildflower website that published them and I often refresh my memory from that collection.
Interesting where the information we post goes. I’m always amazed when I run across something of mine in a place I would never have expected to see it. I’m sure you feel the same.
That is so funny I was just talking about this on my latest blog post Terry, to me the photography is easy it is the identification that is so hard, great shots btw !!
Yes, the identification can be really hard. I think even more so here where there are so few people that few things are published specifically for this area. I use primarily a book that was published in British Columbia and a website at the U of Washington in Seattle.
Strange little flower, isn’t it! Ironically, there is snow forecast for here on Wednesday. Probably nothing mush in the valleys, but up to 4 inches up higher.
I remembered the name from last year, though not the appearance of the flower. Saxifrage sounds a bit like Saxon to me. It certainly does look like it would fit right into a castle’s landscape. The nest reference is interesting, too. It’s just a strange little flower.
The saxifrage family has a varied collection of flowers and I seem to find a new one about every year. I found one today that I must have always overlooked, probably because this on is very tiny. They do have some very pretty members in that family!
You’re becoming the peak saxifrage authority!
LikeLike
Comment by aarontheisen — April 18, 2014 @ 9:37 pm
I guess. About the same as the definition of an “expert” as someone who knows a little about the subject at hand, but lives over a hundred miles away.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 18, 2014 @ 9:41 pm
That’s because you’re famous now!
LikeLike
Comment by wordsfromanneli — April 18, 2014 @ 10:17 pm
I suppose so. It demonstrates the vast emptiness of fame.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 18, 2014 @ 10:24 pm
You’re too modest!
LikeLike
Comment by wordsfromanneli — April 18, 2014 @ 10:25 pm
Not really. I now know slightly less than when I began the search.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 18, 2014 @ 10:45 pm
Amazing little flower!
LikeLike
Comment by centralohionature — April 19, 2014 @ 4:28 am
It is very strange, and very hardy. Very different from the other saxifragae that I’m seen.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:37 am
I can see the resemblance of our saxifragas’s, but this one is naked!
LikeLike
Comment by bentehaarstad — April 19, 2014 @ 4:33 am
It’s different enough that I took me several years to first identify it.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:37 am
Memory is a great thing when it works! That’s an unusual little flower.
LikeLike
Comment by New Hampshire Garden Solutions — April 19, 2014 @ 5:24 am
Yes it’s very unusual. Lots of things going on with it.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:38 am
Haha, that means you’re now an accepted authority on Saxifrages! The world bows to your Saxifrage knowledge! 🙂 Gorgeous photos, especially the first one.
LikeLike
Comment by Jo Woolf — April 19, 2014 @ 5:59 am
Who knows how Google works. There was a very stiif wind coming off the river that day but the plant is so sturdy it stood pretty still.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:40 am
Nice to see these photographs of a flower most folks have never heard of.
LikeLike
Comment by Malcolm R. Campbell — April 19, 2014 @ 6:23 am
It doesn’t get much attention, probably because most overlook it . It really takes a close look to see all of its features and doesn’t have large showy petals like other flowers.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:42 am
I think nidifica was coined to mean ‘makes nests.’ I guess each flower could be seen as a sort of nest. Nice closeup.
LikeLike
Comment by Steve Schwartzman — April 19, 2014 @ 6:59 am
I could see a nest shape in some of the various phases of the blossoms. Hadn’t thought of it though.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:43 am
Highly amusing, Terry.
It’s a great photo anyway. Remarkable detail and focus on that first shot. It such an attractive little flower and most unusual in shape.
(would you believe that’s the way I found many names to put to my flower archives – from turning up an image on my own blog from 3 years ago). I’ve still got about 20 flower images to identify yet.
LikeLike
Comment by Vicki — April 19, 2014 @ 7:01 am
I’m glad I’m not the only one! I’ve found over 200 different species of wildflowers in the approximately 1500 square miles through which I wander, and from year to year I can’t remember all of them. I did compile a file of over 800 photos for a wildflower website that published them and I often refresh my memory from that collection.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:47 am
Interesting where the information we post goes. I’m always amazed when I run across something of mine in a place I would never have expected to see it. I’m sure you feel the same.
LikeLike
Comment by anniespickns — April 19, 2014 @ 7:13 am
Yes, and sometimes I review the viewing activity from the WordPress stats and see activity on some very old posts that must be the result of searches.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 7:50 am
That is so funny I was just talking about this on my latest blog post Terry, to me the photography is easy it is the identification that is so hard, great shots btw !!
LikeLike
Comment by Bernie Kasper — April 19, 2014 @ 8:45 am
Yes, the identification can be really hard. I think even more so here where there are so few people that few things are published specifically for this area. I use primarily a book that was published in British Columbia and a website at the U of Washington in Seattle.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 19, 2014 @ 4:38 pm
What a little charmer that wildflower is … I trust this was not followed by another five feet of snow … 🙂
LikeLike
Comment by Teresa Evangeline — April 19, 2014 @ 5:21 pm
Strange little flower, isn’t it! Ironically, there is snow forecast for here on Wednesday. Probably nothing mush in the valleys, but up to 4 inches up higher.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 21, 2014 @ 7:15 pm
I remembered the name from last year, though not the appearance of the flower. Saxifrage sounds a bit like Saxon to me. It certainly does look like it would fit right into a castle’s landscape. The nest reference is interesting, too. It’s just a strange little flower.
LikeLike
Comment by shoreacres — April 19, 2014 @ 6:40 pm
The saxifrage family has a varied collection of flowers and I seem to find a new one about every year. I found one today that I must have always overlooked, probably because this on is very tiny. They do have some very pretty members in that family!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 21, 2014 @ 7:18 pm
Funny! Good thing you are a knowledgeable source.
LikeLike
Comment by Sue — April 19, 2014 @ 10:33 pm
I wish I were much more knowledgeable, but I’m afraid it’s my more my nature to explore and find things than to study them in detail.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 21, 2014 @ 7:19 pm
You know you have an internet presence when everything points back to you 🙂
LikeLike
Comment by Candace — April 20, 2014 @ 10:17 pm
I’m afraid that my internet presence mostly involves the existence of obscure things. Doing my part to fill some vacuums.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 21, 2014 @ 7:21 pm
Full circle! So cool. 🙂
LikeLike
Comment by Mama's Empty Nest — April 21, 2014 @ 7:50 am
Yes, interesting circle, but not helpful for my research. I do think though that some of my posts help others to identify or understand some things.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 21, 2014 @ 7:23 pm
Beautiful photos, thank you for sharing them!
LikeLike
Comment by David — April 22, 2014 @ 8:55 am
Thank you for visiting, David. I’m glad that you enjoyed the photos.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 22, 2014 @ 8:05 pm
I love this family of flowers
they are so unique, tiny and precious!
LikeLike
Comment by Tammie — April 25, 2014 @ 3:20 pm
It is a very pretty and interesting family, and I seem to find another member every year. There seems to be no end to our wildflower species!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — April 25, 2014 @ 8:06 pm