This photo was taken from about a mile down Forest Service road 887 from Weeksville Divide above Todd Creek. Mount Baldy in the background is about ten miles to the northeast (line of sight).
I had never heard of larch until I started following your blog. Are they pretty much a Montana tree or do they grow elsewhere as well? Another great photograph!!
The western Larch are native to British Columbia, Alberta, Washington, Oregon, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Utah. The closely related Tamarack is found in the northeastern states and all over Canada.
Beautiful! It’s amazing what a difference of a little over 100 miles makes: our larch are definitely on their downhill swing. And I saw many bare aspens this past weekend. Winter is coming.
Yes, the differences in locations that are rather close can be surprising. Most of the Aspens here are bare now too. Still lots of color on the cottonwoods though.
Larch, a most interesting tree, one of those evolutionary deadends which continue to thrive. I see only a few scattered about in ecological niches near me. To see this sea of them is marvelous!
Larch a very important tree in our forests here. It has very good survival strategies, and the thick bark of the older trees allow them to survive most fires. I’m glad to see that these large stands are doing so well!
They are bright, all right, and can survive the harshness of our winters better than maple. We do have mountain maple here, but it’s really a shrub rather than a big tree. In some of the towns other maples have been planted and have done quite well, but they don’t spread and probably wouldn’t survive in the higher elevations.
I’ve never seen larch, except here on your blog. I’d really love to see them in autumn like this. It would be so exciting to come upon a sight like this or your previous post. yellow for as far as you can see.
The closest they come to you would be in Utah, and I don’t recall if they are in the southern part or not. Perhaps in the high country. I know you would love to see them where they just cover the mountainsides.
Western Larch grows in only 6 states, and in the summer it’s difficult to distinguish it from the firs, so it’s easy to miss. It sure changes to looks of the forests this time of year though!
My inlaws once flew into Missoula this time of year and lamented that all the pine trees were dying. They, like so many others, were not familiar with larch, though tamaracks grow in swamps where they live.
That’s interesting. Many people are surprised to find that Larch, which in summer look so much like fir trees or some of the pines, are actually deciduous. Those of us who grew up around them just took it for granted.
Wow! That is beautiful–like a field of golden dandelions in the spring, except on a much grander scale!
LikeLike
Comment by kateri — October 31, 2011 @ 8:57 pm
It does remind me of that too.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — October 31, 2011 @ 10:37 pm
I had never heard of larch until I started following your blog. Are they pretty much a Montana tree or do they grow elsewhere as well? Another great photograph!!
LikeLike
Comment by kcjewel — October 31, 2011 @ 9:05 pm
The western Larch are native to British Columbia, Alberta, Washington, Oregon, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Utah. The closely related Tamarack is found in the northeastern states and all over Canada.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — October 31, 2011 @ 10:40 pm
I’ve always loved big scenery like this. Now that I am living in the country maybe I can get a few pictures of places like this.
LikeLike
Comment by Ratty — October 31, 2011 @ 10:12 pm
I hope you do, Ratty! It seems to me that living in the country will be a perfect fit for you!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — October 31, 2011 @ 10:41 pm
Beautiful!
LikeLike
Comment by Jo Woolf — November 1, 2011 @ 12:16 am
Thanks Jo!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 9:00 am
Totally impressive. What a view, I think the only thing that could possibly beat it would be to fly over it in a small plane.
LikeLike
Comment by anniespickns — November 1, 2011 @ 6:46 am
The Larch really put on a display, don’t they!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 9:02 am
Beautiful! It’s amazing what a difference of a little over 100 miles makes: our larch are definitely on their downhill swing. And I saw many bare aspens this past weekend. Winter is coming.
LikeLike
Comment by columbiahighlands — November 1, 2011 @ 9:06 am
Yes, the differences in locations that are rather close can be surprising. Most of the Aspens here are bare now too. Still lots of color on the cottonwoods though.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:26 pm
Wow. What an incredible sight that must be in person. A beautiful photograph.
LikeLike
Comment by Teresa Evangeline — November 1, 2011 @ 9:41 am
It really is gorgeous to experience, Teresa. A photo can only do so much.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:27 pm
Mercy sakes alive… Montana is so awesome!!! =)
LikeLike
Comment by Tricia — November 1, 2011 @ 11:32 am
I think it is too, Tricia. Perhaps because there is still quite a bit of it that is still in a natural condition.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:35 pm
Larch, a most interesting tree, one of those evolutionary deadends which continue to thrive. I see only a few scattered about in ecological niches near me. To see this sea of them is marvelous!
LikeLike
Comment by Scott Thomas Photography — November 1, 2011 @ 12:12 pm
Larch a very important tree in our forests here. It has very good survival strategies, and the thick bark of the older trees allow them to survive most fires. I’m glad to see that these large stands are doing so well!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:40 pm
That is as good as a stand of maples.
LikeLike
Comment by sandy — November 1, 2011 @ 3:15 pm
They are bright, all right, and can survive the harshness of our winters better than maple. We do have mountain maple here, but it’s really a shrub rather than a big tree. In some of the towns other maples have been planted and have done quite well, but they don’t spread and probably wouldn’t survive in the higher elevations.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:44 pm
Beautiful! What a majestic stand of Larch! How I love this time of year when those trails are carpeted in gold!
LikeLike
Comment by Maureen — November 1, 2011 @ 3:55 pm
I love this too, Maureen! It must be interesting for you to see photos of fall, when you are living in spring at the moment!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:45 pm
Miles and miles of beauty. I just love their color…. it’s so cheery, that even on a dreary day it will seem as if the sun is shining.
LikeLike
Comment by TheDailyClick — November 1, 2011 @ 5:10 pm
They are cheery, and when the sun hits them the seem to glow.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:46 pm
I’ve never seen larch, except here on your blog. I’d really love to see them in autumn like this. It would be so exciting to come upon a sight like this or your previous post. yellow for as far as you can see.
LikeLike
Comment by Candace — November 1, 2011 @ 8:46 pm
The closest they come to you would be in Utah, and I don’t recall if they are in the southern part or not. Perhaps in the high country. I know you would love to see them where they just cover the mountainsides.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 1, 2011 @ 10:52 pm
I have yet to see an entire mountain in autumn color–what a spectacular sight it is in a photograph, can hardly imagine the real thing.
LikeLike
Comment by Bo Mackison — November 2, 2011 @ 4:26 am
It’s magnificent. I’m so thankful that I can still get into the back country and enjoy scenes like that!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 2, 2011 @ 9:25 am
The depth of color with these trees make your eyes wonder if there an end.
LikeLike
Comment by Anonymous — November 2, 2011 @ 6:18 am
There are probably millions of acres of forest that include Larch in westen Montana. It does seem as though there is no end.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 2, 2011 @ 9:27 am
quite gorgeous, looks like home to me!
LikeLike
Comment by Tammie — November 2, 2011 @ 12:07 pm
Don’t you love it when the forest looks like that!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 2, 2011 @ 9:17 pm
I can’t believe it but I don’t think I’ve seen larch before. It’s beautiful.
LikeLike
Comment by Tammy — November 2, 2011 @ 9:03 pm
Western Larch grows in only 6 states, and in the summer it’s difficult to distinguish it from the firs, so it’s easy to miss. It sure changes to looks of the forests this time of year though!
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 2, 2011 @ 9:19 pm
This is glorious!!
LikeLike
Comment by dhphotosite — November 3, 2011 @ 9:45 am
We are having a very pretty fall for colors this year. The Larch are at their peak now.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 3, 2011 @ 4:27 pm
At first sight, I thought that the landscape presented a cornfield, because the trees were so equally long. It is very beautiful scenery.
LikeLike
Comment by sartenada — November 4, 2011 @ 4:12 am
The trees in the foreground are all about the same age. I think they were planted after a fire.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 4, 2011 @ 8:38 pm
My inlaws once flew into Missoula this time of year and lamented that all the pine trees were dying. They, like so many others, were not familiar with larch, though tamaracks grow in swamps where they live.
LikeLike
Comment by Kim — November 9, 2011 @ 6:39 pm
That’s interesting. Many people are surprised to find that Larch, which in summer look so much like fir trees or some of the pines, are actually deciduous. Those of us who grew up around them just took it for granted.
LikeLike
Comment by montucky — November 9, 2011 @ 11:40 pm